GEMINI OBSERVATORY
observing time request (HTML summary)

Semester: 2004APartner reference:
Not Available
PI time requested:
2.75 hours
Gemini reference:
GN-2003A-Q-05
Partner ranking:
Not Available
PI minimum time requested:
0.0 hours
Instruments(s):
GMOS South
NTAC recommended time:
0.0 hours
PI future time requested:
0.0 nights
Observing mode: queueNTAC minimum recommended:
0.0 hours
PI total from all partners: 2.75 hours
(joint proposals)
Time awarded:
4.0 hours
Proposal submitted to: United Kingdom


Title:Gemini discovers the largest object in the universe
Principal Investigator:Garret Cotter
PI institution:University of Oxford, (From Oct 2003),Department of Physics, Astrophysics, Nuclear and Astrophysics Laboratory,Keble Road,Oxford,OX1 3RH,United Kingdom
PI status:PhD/Doctorate
PI phone / fax / e-mail:44-1223-337312 / 44-1223-354599 / garret@mrao.cam.ac.uk
Principal Contact:Garret Cotter
PC institution:University of Oxford
PC phone / fax / e-mail:44-1223-337312 / 44-1223-354599 / garret@mrao.cam.ac.uk
Co-investigators:Richard Hunstead: University of Sydney (Astrophysics), rwh@physics.usyd.edu.au
Anne Green: University of Sydney (Astrophysics), agreen@physics.usyd.edu.au

Abstract: We propose to obtain the spectroscopic redshift of MST J1449-6047, a newly-discovered giant radio galaxy (GRG) which we estimate, at ten megaparsecs across, to be the largest object known in the universe. This GRG was found serendipitously in the Molonglo Galactic Plane survey and our investigations in the near-IR and with the AAT show that the low galactic latitude demands the use of GMOS-S to measure the galaxy redshift.

MST J1449-6047 is an exciting example of the new types of radiosource being discovered by the new generation of sensitive southern radio surveys. Detailed studies of this source and others like it promise to reveal the properties of the intergalactic medium megaparsecs away from the host galaxies, as well as determining the physical reasons why some AGN can fuel radiosources which can grow to almost cosmological sizes.


Science Justification

Background

----------

Giant radiogalaxies (GRGs) are one of the most extreme classes of AGN: the radio cocoons of these sources extend to Mpc distances from the host galaxy. Notably, GRGs provide a unique probe of the intergalactic medium (IGM); optical and radio observations allow us to determine the physical conditions in the lobes of the sources and the environment megaparsecs from the host galaxy (see, e.g., Subrahmanyan & Saripalli 1993).

Historically, GRGs were thought to be extremely rare. They were generally missed from radio surveys in the past because, despite having total fluxes greater than the nominal survey limit, their large angular sizes meant that they fell below the survey surface brightness limit. However, with the advent of new radio surveys especially sensitive to low surface brightness objects, we have demonstrated that GRGs are relatively common, even out to redshifts approaching z = 1 (Cotter et al. 1996). Extreme objects are always important for testing theories and models, but now it is clear that GRGs are a significant fraction of the AGN population, a detailed investigation into their properties is urgent, so that we may explain why they grow to such extreme size and how they relate to the rest of the population.

* Are they associated with particularly powerful central engines?

* Do they inhabit extremely under-dense environments?

* Are they in fact typical radiogalaxies, but seen at extreme age?

We have recently discovered a radiosource which may prove to be the largest example of a GRG. Our preliminary observations in the radio, optical and near-IR indicate that GMOS-S spectroscopy will allow us to address these questions directly.

The Molonglo Observatory Synthesis Telescope (MOST) has recently completed a survey of the southern Galactic Plane at 843 MHz with a resolution of 43'' (Green et al. 1999). This survey, the precursor to a survey of the whole southern sky with the MOST, revealed a source with an appearance typical of a powerful radiogalaxy and an angular extent of 25'. We have now obtained a high-resolution radio image of the source with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA; see Fig. 1). However, MST J1449-6047 lies only one degree from the galactic plane, making conventional optical investigations difficult.

From our AT observations of J1449-6047, we have obtained an accurate position for the radio core. There is no identification on the Digitized Sky Survey, so we observed the field with CASPIR on the ANU 2.3 m in J and K_n. The radio core is coincident with an extended object (3'' FWHM cf 1.5'' for stars in the field) with integrated magnitude K_n = 15.0 +/- 0.3 (see Fig. 2). From the K-band magnitude-redshift relation, which has a narrow dispersion at redshifts out to z = 1 for all known types of radiosource host galaxy, including GRGs (McCarthy 1993, Eales et al. 1997), we estimate a redshift of 0.2 < z < 0.35. This is supported by the radio flux and morphology: the source has typical FRII-class structure, so the well-defined FRI/FRII break in radio luminosity sets a lower limit on the redshift of the source of z > 0.24. (In FRI sources, the radio jets are disrupted close to the nucleus and flare to give the source a disturbed structure; in FRII sources the jets remain collimated to the extremities of the source and terminate in compact ``hotspots'' from which the jet plasma flows backward to inflate the radio lobes --- see, for example, Fanaroff & Riley 1974). If this redshift estimate is correct, J1449-6047 is the largest known single object in the universe, with a linear size of some 10 Mpc.

Not only are the radio jets in J1449-6047 well collimated to a distance of perhaps 5 Mpc from the AGN, they are almost exactly the same length in _both_ directions. This suggests that the environment of the source must have an extremely low density; indeed the lobes of the source must essentially be interacting with whatever comprises the IGM on the largest scales. The low-density hypothesis is further supported by the extreme axial ratio (lobe length/width) of the source, which is > 15 compared to the typical value of approximately 6. It seems plausible, therefore, that J1449-6047 may provide not only an example of a GRG which is unequivocally in a low-density environment compared with other classes of AGN, but, tantalizingly, the possibility of a massive galaxy inhabiting a void of size at least 10 Mpc.

Scientific goals

------------

* We wish to obtain an accurate redshift for J1449-6047 using FORS spectroscopy. We will obtain a spectrum of the host galaxy sensitive enough to obtain an absorption line redshift.

* An accurate redshift will allow us to determine the exact size and luminosity of the radiosource, and, since the near-IR light is dominated by emission from the old stellar population, we may use our existing near-IR imaging to measure the stellar mass of the host galaxy (see, e.g., Aragn-Salamanca et al. 1993, Best et al. 1997, Eales et al. 1997).

* An accurate redshift will allow us to determine the physical size of the host galaxy, which in turn will provide useful information on the dynamical evolution, merger history, and environment of J1449-6047. Of particular interest is the characteristic radius of the host galaxy. Large characteristic sizes are indicative of ``cannibalistic'' histories (see e.g. Hausman & Ostriker 1978), and have been found for the most massive radiosource hosts (e.g. Best et al. 1997). Small characteristic sizes, however, indicate less dense environments, and are found for less massive host galaxies (Roche et al. 1997). By making an accurate measurement of the host galaxy's morphology we may infer whether the environment is indeed extremely rarefied, as suggested by our previous observations.

References

----------

Aragon-Salamanca, A., Ellis, R., Couch, W., Carter, D., 1993, MNRAS 262,764.

Best, P., Longair, M., Rottgering, H., 1997, MNRAS 295, 549.

Cotter, G., Rawlings, S., Saunders, R., 1996, MNRAS 281, 1081.

Eales, S., 1985, MNRAS 213, 899.

Eales, S., Rawlings, S., Law-Green, D., Cotter, G., Lacy, M., 1997, MNRAS 291, 593.

Fanaroff, B., Riley, J., 1974, MNRAS 167,31P.

Green, A., et al., 1999, ApJS 122, 207.

Hausman, M., Ostriker, J., 1978, ApJ 224, 320.

Laing, R., Jenkins, C., Wall, J., Unger, S., 1994, A.S.P. Conf. Series 54, 195.

Larkin, J., Armus, L., Knop, R., Soifer, B., Matthews, K., 1998, ApJS 114, 59.

McCarthy, P., 1993, ARA&A 31, 639.

Roche, N., Eales, S., Rawlings, S., 1998, MNRAS 297, 405.

Rawlings, S., Saunders, R., 1991, Nature 349, 138.

Subrahmanyan, R., Saripalli, L., 1993, MNRAS 260, 908.

Attachments:

NameSourceType
Figures pagegemini_figs.psPS

Technical Justification

The need for GMOS

-----------------

Our request to use GMOS to obtain a redshift for this radiogalaxy is driven primarily by the low galactic latitude of the target (b = 1.2 degrees). Targetting the ID from our J- and Kn-band imaging, we obtained an 8000-s spectrum with the RGO spectrograph on the AAT. The spectral range was 5500---9500 Angstrom and the spectral resolution 12 Angstrom. This spectrum revealed that the target is indeed strongly reddened, with the continuum being too faint to obtain a redshift with a 4-m telescope.

In the blue, where strong features such as the Ca H & K lines are expected to lie, we estimate magnitudes of V_AB = 21, B_AB = 21.4 through a 2-arcsecond slit in 1.5--2 arcsecond seeing. We detect no features in the faint continuum. The target is somewhat brighter in the red---perhaps by up to 3 AB-mags by 9000 Angstrom---but again in our AAT observations we have found it impossible to obtain a redshift. This region of the spectrum is close to featureless for E gals; moreover, we have found that the slit is almost completely filled with foreground objects in this crowded field and so subtraction of the many OH and H2O skylines in the red is extremely inaccurate (see Fig. 3). We have found that any absorption feature with an equivalent width of less that about 10 Angstrom is undetectable. Similarly, the crowded field effectively rules out AAT spectroscopy in the IR, where nodding along the slit---onto foreground stars or HII-region emission rather than blank sky---would be necessary for sky subtraction.

We therefore believe that a spectrum taken in the blue with an 8-m class telescope will be essential to obtain a spectroscopic redshift for MST J1449-6047; moreover, as outlined below, this is an observation which may be obtained in relatively poor conditions, making it exceptionally well suited for the GMOS-S queue.

Calculation of required observations

------------------------------------

We propose to obtain a short g-band image to determine the optical core position of MST J1449-6047 to sub-arcsecond accuracy and to confirm our spectrophotometric measurement of the galaxy's magnitude. We then propose to obtain a single spectrum deep enough to ensure that we can secure an absorption-line redshift. Using the GMOS integration calculator we find that a 300-s exposure will give a significant detection even with 85-percentile seeing, 50-percentile cloud and 50-percentile sky brightness. We do not expect that overheads for acquisition and readout should be more than ten minutes so our total request for pre-imaging is 15 minutes.

We require a deep spectrum in the blue, so we request dark time; our exposure time estimates are based on the new-moon sky brightness, which is similar to the brightness of the target in B. However, as detailed below, we can use a relativle wide slit and can tolerate some cloud, meaning our seeing and waether constraints are modest.

The low radio-luminosity of the source means that forbidden emission lines may be very weak, and perhaps not detectable in a reasonable integration time (see, e.g., Rawlings & Saunders 1991). Therefore our spectrum must detect the absorption features of the rest-frame blue and near-UV, such as the Ca H & K features, the 4000-Angstrom break, and metal absorption bands such as G-band and MgI (for the old stellar populations typically found in z < 1 radiogalaxies we do not expect strong Balmer absorption features). We expect equivalent widths of a few Angstrom and velocity widths ~ 100 to 300 km/s, in common with other radiogalaxies at these redshifts. To guarantee an absorption-line redshift from such features we aim for a spectrum with a S/N of 10 per pixel using the 600 line/mm grating and 2x binning in the spectral direction.

From our AAT observations, we estimate a B_AB-band magnitude of 22.5 through a 2-arcsec slit in 1.5-arcsec seeing. Next, we take an E-gal model in the GMOS integration calculator to determine the optimum configuration and exposure time. We find that in 50-percentile cloud, a 7200-s exposure will allow a S/N > 10 at all wavelengths. Estimating a total of 30 mins overhads for acquisition and readouts between individual frames, our total request is 150 minutes.


Observation Details

ObservationRADecBrightnessTotal Time
(including overheads)
MST J1449-406714 49 48.1-60 47 28.3B_AB approx 21.4, V_AB approx 2215.0 minutes
     GSC0900705005 (wfs)14:49:10.126-60:50:14.289.41 magseparation 5.39
     observing conditions: Pre-imagingresources: g filter
MST J1449-406714 49 48.1-60 47 28.3B_AB approx 21.4, V_AB approx 22150.0 minutes
     GSC0900705005 (wfs)14:49:10.126-60:50:14.289.41 magseparation 5.39
     observing conditions: dark, some cloud, poor seeingresources: B600 2 arcsec slit

Resources

Observing Conditions
NameImage QualitySky BackgroundWater VaporCloud Cover
Pre-imaging85%50%Any50%
dark, some cloud, poor seeing85%20%Any50%

Scheduling Information:

Synchronous dates:
Reason:

Optimal dates:
Reason:

Impossible dates:
Reason:


Allocation Committee Comments

ITAC Comment

The Gemini queue is divided into four scientific ranking bands (SRBs). Within each band, all proposals are assumed to have equal scientific merit. The choice of which observation within which program to execute next depends on the match to current observing conditions, balance of each partner's usage and other factors. The aim is to exhaust band 1 (highest ranked) before moving onto band 2 etc. Thus the likelihood of execution decreases from band 1 through to band 4. Bands 1 through 3 fill the nominal time available (excluding weather loss); programs in band 4 overfill the queue and provide further flexibility with respect to weather conditions and foreseen or unforeseen problems. For more information on queue execution, the SRBs and the status of observation execution, please see the Gemini schedules web page (http://www.gemini.edu/sciops/schedules/schedIndex.html or your local mirror).

You must define the detailed observations for your queue program using the Gemini Phase II Observing Tool (OT). The OT is available at http://www.gemini.edu/sciops/OThelp/otIndex.html but has not yet been updated for semester 2001B. Further details about the Phase II process can be found at http://www.gemini.edu/sciops/ObsProcess/ObsProcPh2Overview.html (or your local mirror).

The first point of contact for any queries when constructing your Phase II program should be your National Gemini Office, using the web-based HelpDesk at http://www.gemini.edu/sciops/helpdesk/helpdeskIndex.html (or your local mirror).

After submission of your Phase II program to Gemini for verification and execution, your program will be the responsibility of a Gemini Contact Scientist (CS). Henceforth, the CS is the point of contact regarding your observations and will communicate with you if further information is required. Note that the observer, i.e. the person who will be executing your observations at the telescope, may not be the Contact Scientist.

Gemini Comment

No Comment

Additional Information


Keyword Category: Extra Galactic

Keywords: Diffuse intergalactic medium, Jets, Radio galaxies

Publications:

Allocations:
ReferenceTime% UsefulComment


Proposal Contents

Summary
Investigators
Abstract
Science Justification
Technical Justification
Observation Details
Allocation Committee Comments
Additional Information