The behaviour of racquets and balls is governed mainly by Newton’s
three Laws of Tennis. These laws are fully explained in our book The Physics
and Technology of Tennis. The following is a summary of a few topics of
interest to give you a flavour of how physics relates to sport and to the real
world of everyday objects.
A tennis racquet, like a baseball or cricket bat, has a sweet spot. If
a ball impacts at the sweet spot, the force transmitted to the hand is
sufficiently small that the player is almost unaware that the impact has
occured. If the ball impacts at a point well away from the sweet spot, the
player will feel some jarring and vibration of the handle. The sweet spot is a
vibration node, located near the centre of the strings. Another potential sweet
spot is the centre of percussion (COP). These and some other significant spots
on a racquet are shown below.

Contrary to popular opinion, the sweet spot does not coincide with the point at which the ball rebounds with maximum speed, nor does it locate the spot where the force on the hand is zero. Forces on the hand arise from three independent motions of the handle, namely rotation, translation and vibration. The vibrational component is absent when a ball strikes the vibration node. The rotational component, arising from recoil of the racquet head, exerts a torque on the hand, causing it rotate about an axis through the wrist. As a result, a force is always exerted on the upper part of the hand, and a force in the opposite direction is always exerted on the lower part of the hand.
The COP shown in the diagram above is located close to the node point when the racquet is freely suspended, but it shifts into the throat area of the racquet when the racquet is held in the hand. Consequently, the COP shown in the diagram is NOT the sweet spot that players talk about.
2. Vibration Nodes
The first two vibration modes of a freely suspended tennis racquet are
shown below. A racquet behaves like a uniform beam in this respect, despite its
round head, since the centre of mass of a racquet is near the centre of the
racquet. The fundamental mode has a frequency of about 100 Hz for a relatively
flexible frame or about 180 Hz for a stiff frame. One node is near the centre
of the strings, and the other node is in the handle. It is easy to hear this
vibration if you hold the handle lightly at the node in the handle, with the
handle near your ear, then strike the frame or strings. The vibration node on
the strings is easily located using this technique. If you hold the handle
firmly, the frame vibrations (but not the string vibrations) are strongly damped.

The next mode, for a uniform beam, has a frequency 2.75 times the
fundamental frequency. It is not excited with any significant amplitude since
the impact duration, T, of the ball on the strings is about 5 ms. The frequency
spectrum of this pulse, approximately a half sine waveform, peaks at zero
frequency and is zero at f = 1.5/T = 300 Hz , close to the second mode
frequency. The impact will still excite string vibrations at about 500 Hz since
the strings are not as strongly damped as the frame.

|
|
|
|
A metal tube will vibrate nicely when struck with a metal rod, but it does not vibrate when struck with a tennis ball. How come? The impact duration, about 0.005 sec, is too long to excite any vibration with a period shorter than about 0.002 sec, especially if the tube is struck at the fundamental vibration node (its sweet spot). |
|


Consider a racquet that is freely suspended by a long length of string
or balanced vertically on the end of its handle. If a ball impacts at the
centre of mass (CM), the racquet will recoil at a speed V. All parts of the
racquet will recoil at the same speed V. If the ball impacts at any other point
on the strings, the racquet will recoil and it will also rotate about its CM.
The whole racquet then moves away from the ball with a speed V1 due to the
recoil , but the handle simultaneously moves towards the ball with speed V2 due
to rotation of the racquet. If there is any point in the handle where V1 = V2,
then that point will remain stationary and the rest of the racquet will rotate
about that point as shown below.
The
axis of rotation is called the conjugate point with respect to the impact
point, and the impact point is called the centre of percussion (COP) for that
particular axis of rotation. The axis and the COP form a pair of conjugate
points. For an impact near the tip of the racquet, the axis of rotation is
about half way between the end of the handle and the CM. For an impact near the
throat of the racquet, the axis of rotation is beyond the end of the handle.
Now
consider a racquet that is suspended by a rod passing through a hole drilled
through the handle so that the racquet can rotate freely about this axis when a
ball strikes the strings. When a ball impacts on the strings, the handle will
exert a force on the axis unless the ball impacts at the COP. Consequently, the
COP is often regarded as a second sweet spot since the force on the hand should
be zero for an impact at the COP. However, the hand adds an additional mass of
about 500 gram to the handle, and it shifts the location of the COP to a
position near the throat area of the racquet. The details of this effect are described in an Am J. Phys article
that you can download here.

Clamp the end of the handle on a table,
using your hand to press on the handle, so the rest of the racquet hangs over
the edge of the table. Then drop a ball onto the strings at various points. The
ball will bounce best near the throat. There is a spot near the tip where the
ball doesn't bounce at all. That's the dead spot. At the dead spot, all of the
energy of the ball is given to the racquet, and the racquet does not give any
energy back to the ball. The reason is that the effective mass of the racquet
at that point is equal to the mass of the ball. The effective mass is the ratio
of the force at that point to the acceleration at that point (F = ma so m =
F/a). If a ball of mass m collides head-on with another ball of mass m at rest,
then the incident ball stops dead and gives all its energy to the other ball.
Similarly, if a moving racquet strikes a
stationary ball at the dead spot, then all the rotational energy of the racquet
is given to the ball. A good place to hit a ball when serving is near the dead
spot. However, when returning a fast serve, the dead spot is the worst place to
hit the ball. The best spot is nearer the throat of the racquet since that's
where the ball bounces best.
The rules of tennis specify that the
ball must bounce to a height between 53 and 58 inches when dropped from a
height of 100 inches onto a concrete slab. What happens in actual play is hard
to predict, but a good test is to drop a ball onto the strings when the head is
clamped (eg by placing the racquet on the floor and stepping on the handle near
the head). When dropped from a height of say 1 metre, the ball will bounce to a
height of about 0.70 metre. The ball loses about 45% of its energy when dropped
on concrete, but it loses only 30% of its energy when dropped on the strings.
That's because the strings absorb some of the impact energy and then give
almost all of that back to the ball. The amount of energy lost by the ball
depends on its compression. When dropped from 100 inches on concrete, it
compresses by about 6 mm. When dropped on the strings, it compresses by about 3
mm. The bigger the compression, the more energy is lost when the ball expands
back to its original shape. That means that at high impact speeds, where the
ball compresses more, the energy loss is even greater. Furthermore, the
fraction of the ball's energy that is lost also increases as the the ball's
energy is increased or as the compression is increased.
6. Ball Spin
The modern game of tennis is dominated
by the amount of spin that players can impart to the ball. The change from
small 9 inch heads in wood racquets to large 10.5 inch heads in graphite
racquets allowed players to hit with more topspin since the ball was less
likely to clip the frame. This also allowed players to hit the ball harder
since balls hit with topspin dive down more sharply onto the court after they
clear the net. By hitting the ball harder, players generated even more topspin,
which allowed them to hit the ball even harder. The modern game is played at a
much faster pace than in the wood racquet era, not because modern racquets or
players are more powerful but because racquet heads are now an inch or two
wider, allowing players to hit the ball with much more topspin.
To extract as much topspin as possible
from a stroke, players have learnt to swing up at the ball and to tilt the
racquet head forward, That way, a ball coming off the court with topspin can be
returned with topspin. The spin direction must be reversed to achieve this
result. Two QuickTime movie files are attached showing how this is done, one by myself and one by Federer. The
physics of each shot is the same, the only real difference being that Federer
has a more elegant style. In my case, I filmed the shot at 25 frames/sec. The
top half of the film is taken 10 ms before the bottom half so the magnitude and
direction of spin could be measured more easily. The film of Federer was taken
at about 1000 frames/sec judging by the fact that the ball sits on the strings
for about 5ms and is seen for 4 or 5 frames on the strings.
7.
PowerPoint Presentations and Movies
I often get requests from students wanting ideas for experiments or projects
relating to the physics of tennis. I have prepared a few PowerPoint presentations on this subject, including some of
the basic physics behind each experiment. They can be viewed directly on the
web or downloaded as .ppt files. This page also contains some movies concerning
various tennis experiments.
Brody, H. (1979) Physics of the tennis racket. American Journal of
Physics 47, 482-487.
Brody, H. (1981) Physics of the tennis racket II: The sweet spot. American
Journal of Physics, 49, 816-819.
Brody, H. (1987) Tennis Science for Tennis Players, University of Pennsylvania
Press.
Brody, H. (1995) How would a physicist design a tennis racket?. Physics Today,
48, 26-31.
Howard
Brody, Rod Cross and Crawford Lindsey, The Physics and Technology of Tennis
(available from www.racquettech.com)
Rod
Cross and Crawford Lindsey, Technical
Tennis (also available from www.racquettech.com)
Rod
Cross, Crawford Lindsey and Howard Brody at the TST2003 Tennis Conference
organised by the International Tennis Federation in London.